On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:15:02PM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > yes dropping rrd_flush from the api is not a good idea, otoh it > does not acomplish anything sensible in the code, so I propose the > following: > > have rrdc_flush for the client flushing function > and turn rrd_flush into a no-op for backward compatibility
finally getting ready to publish 1.4rc I have resolved the rrd_flush inconsitancy by renaming rrd_cmd_flush to rrd_flushcached and the "rrdtool flush" command along with it. r1812 and r1813 cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list rrd-developers@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
