In einer eMail vom 10.07.2009 20:13:18 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt [email protected]:
This makes sense. Any viable solution to the routing scalability problem will have to use IP addresses as locators, since this is a prerequisite for incremental deployability. - Christian Sorry Christian that I have a different opinion. At first, a locator, i.e. a location information, must be routable (aggregatable is something completely different) and, of course, it must be written somewhere, e.g. into the field for destination IP address, and/or destination MAC-address and eventually, for some transitional time, into a new additional header. Even LISP authors emphasized that the locator addresses inside the LISP header could potentially make up a new namespace. However it is the LISP supporters' decision to use non-routable IP addresses instead, or better said, the same IP-address-based routing technique which produced and produces the scalability problem. Heiner
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
