Noel Chiappa allegedly wrote on 01/24/2010 14:47 EST: > LISP is really intended to achieve one chief goal: to split up location and > identity, and do so in a way that is economically and deployably practical.
(Insert repeat of arguments about "identity", and how LISP separates global from local routing, here.) > Yes, doing that does improve things over in the routing sphere, because now > things that people were trying to do with routing (improperly, due to > hammer-nail syndrome) can be done with a better tool. Right. The problem is that endpoints and agents have been mixing identification and separation, and routing was trying to take up the slack. > However, LISP is still not a new routing architecture - which I claim we will > still need, when all the dust settles. And _none_ of the proposals here (well, > the Compact Routing stuff comes closest) is a new routing architecture.... The just-in-time ugly Internet. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
