rrg  

Messages by Date

• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Terminology - CES & CEE again Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] IPv4 & IPv6 routing scaling problems Dale W. Carder
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Terminology Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Terminology Noel Chiappa
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Sundry ILNP confusions... Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/03 [rrg] IPv4 & IPv6 routing scaling problems Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host identifiers (ILNP) Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Tony Li
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Tony Li
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host identifiers (ILNP) Tony Li
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Terminology Noel Chiappa
• 2010/02/03 [rrg] Terminology RJ Atkinson
• 2010/02/03 [rrg] Thanks RJ Atkinson
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Sundry ILNP confusions... RJ Atkinson
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] RANGER and SEAL critique Templin, Fred L
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Joel M. Halpern
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Scott Brim
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Brian E Carpenter
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Fleischman, Eric
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Joel M. Halpern
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Name Based Sockets alternative critique Javier Ubillos
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Noel Chiappa
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Javier Ubillos
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host identifiers (ILNP) Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Templin, Fred L
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host identifiers (ILNP) Joel M. Halpern
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Joel M. Halpern
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/03 [rrg] hIPv4 overview Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host identifiers (ILNP) Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host identifiers (ILNP) Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/02/03 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Fred's IPv4 PMTUD research: RFC1191 support frequently broken Christopher Morrow
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Christopher Morrow
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Christopher Morrow
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/02 [rrg] Fred's IPv4 PMTUD research: RFC1191 support frequently broken Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Name Based Sockets alternative critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Templin, Fred L
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Brian E Carpenter
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] "not at all sure that the terms CES and CEE are even useful" !? Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constra HeinerHummel
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Templin, Fred L
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT HeinerHummel
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Florin Coras
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Scott Brim
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Scott Brim
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Lixia Zhang
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Noel Chiappa
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Embedding geo info in PA addresses=>A compromise between geo-aggregatable and provider-aggregetable address//re: Aggregatable EIDs Noel Chiappa
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Name Based Sockets alternative critique Javier Ubillos
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Javier Ubillos
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] RANGER and SEAL critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Embedding geo info in PA addresses=>A compromise between geo-aggreg HeinerHummel
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] Widespread involuntary adoption Eliot Lear
• 2010/02/02 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Embedding geo info in PA addresses=>A compromise between geo-aggregatable and provider-aggregetable address//re: Aggregatable EIDs Lixia Zhang
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Tony Li
• 2010/02/01 [rrg] Another concern about using FQDNs as host idenfieirs//re: A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/02/01 [rrg] "not at all sure that the terms CES and CEE are even useful" !? Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/01 [rrg] Terminology for CES "core" and "edge" address space Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Noel Chiappa
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Mark Handley
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Scott Brim
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Scott Brim
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Joel M. Halpern
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Scott Brim
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Scott Brim
• 2010/02/01 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Joel M. Halpern
• 2010/02/01 [rrg] SIP will work fine with CES, CEE won't work with NAT Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/01 [rrg] CES & CEE are completely different (graphs) Robin Whittle
• 2010/02/01 [rrg] Today's "IP addr. = ID = Loc" naming model should be retained Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/31 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/01/31 [rrg] AIS - goals and techniques Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/31 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/31 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
• 2010/01/31 Re: [rrg] moving towards recommendation: the current plan Lixia Zhang
• 2010/01/31 [rrg] Terminology: Loc/Id sep., LISP, CEE & CES, namespace Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] moving towards recommendation: the current plan Lixia Zhang
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Lixia Zhang
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Name Based Sockets alternative critique Lixia Zhang
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Tony Li
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Tony Li
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Widespread involuntary adoption Tony Li
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Widespread involuntary adoption Brian E Carpenter
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Widespread involuntary adoption Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/30 [rrg] Widespread involuntary adoption Brian E Carpenter
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Joel M. Halpern
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/30 [rrg] Include constraints due to the need for widespread voluntary adoption? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Dino Farinacci
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? John E Drake
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Joel M. Halpern
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Joel M. Halpern
• 2010/01/30 Re: [rrg] Name Based Sockets alternative critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/29 [rrg] Multiple critiques, choice of single proposal, consensus on constraints due to voluntary adoption? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/29 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Templin, Fred L
• 2010/01/29 Re: [rrg] Name Based Sockets alternative critique Lixia Zhang
• 2010/01/29 [rrg] Name Based Sockets alternative critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/28 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/28 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Dan Wing
• 2010/01/28 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/28 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Tony Li
• 2010/01/28 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Tony Li
• 2010/01/28 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/01/28 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Tony Li
• 2010/01/28 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/01/28 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Tony Li
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Tony Li
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Tony Li
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xiaoliang Zhao
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] RANGER and SEAL critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/27 [rrg] SEAL critique, PMTUD, RFC4821 = vapourware Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] RANGER and SEAL critique Templin, Fred L
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Tony Li
• 2010/01/27 Re: [rrg] RANGER and SEAL critique Templin, Fred L
• 2010/01/27 [rrg] Purpose and mechanisms of a Core-Edge Separation scheme - Ivip in particular Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] RANGER and SEAL critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/26 [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] RANGER and SEAL critique Templin, Fred L
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] RANGER and SEAL critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] Next revision George, Wes E [NTK]
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Brian E Carpenter
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] RANGER and SEAL critique Templin, Fred L
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Brian E Carpenter
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/26 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Fred Baker
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/25 [rrg] The LISP team does not appear to read or critique other proposals Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/25 [rrg] TIDR critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Ivip exemplifies Noel's support for "Adventurous Practical Design" Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] LISP-TREE - DNS-like mapping to replace ALT? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] finally: all submitted proposals on RRG wiki Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Scott Brim
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/25 [rrg] LISP-TREE - DNS-like mapping to replace ALT? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Ivip exemplifies Noel's support for "Adventurous Practical Design" Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/25 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/01/24 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? heinerhummel
• 2010/01/24 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/24 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Scott Brim
• 2010/01/24 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/24 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Scott Brim
• 2010/01/23 Re: [rrg] Ivip exemplifies Noel's support for "Adventurous Practical Design" Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/23 Re: [rrg] Alternative LISP critique Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/23 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/23 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Alternative LISP critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/22 [rrg] Ivip exemplifies Noel's support for "Adventurous Practical Design" Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Brian E Carpenter
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Alternative LISP critique Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Alternative LISP critique Noel Chiappa
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Alternative LISP critique heinerhummel
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Alternative LISP critique Eliot Lear
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Xu Xiaohu
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation? Patrick Frejborg
• 2010/01/22 Re: [rrg] Alternative LISP critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/21 Re: [rrg] Non-consensus (was LISP critique) Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/21 Re: [rrg] Alternative LISP critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/21 Re: [rrg] Ivip Critique Robin Whittle
• 2010/01/21 Re: [rrg] Alternative LISP critique Pekka Savola
• 2010/01/21 [rrg] Next revision Tony Li

• Earlier messages
• Later messages