Hi all,
Speaking for myself, without input from Lixia (and this is thus
non-binding):
Joel M. Halpern wrote:
If someone wants to add text on Identifier / Locator separation as a
useful architectural principle, I guess I can't object.
If someone were to propose text and get rough consensus on this, I would
definitely be interested in adopting it.
And I consider the CEE / CES debate to be missing the point.
Firstly, many of the solutions and not purely one or the other. As Noel
has observed, one can migrate LISP (ostensibly a CES solution) into the
host.
Architecturally, and in terms of the end state, I think that CEE is a
much better target.
In terms of deployability and related issues, CES techniques tend to
have a big advantage.
Hence, I have a personal preference for solutions which straddle this
boundary, rather than seeing utility in arguing about which one we want.
And I don't the the RG has a clear agreement on this at all.
I generally agree with this: we don't necessarily have the right
characterization of the solution space. However, I have to interject
that I'm absolutely thrilled to see us actually having an architectural
discussion. I hope it progresses and refines itself quickly.
Tony
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
