>> >> I heartily agree that further work on automatic renumbering is needed. >> However, ILNP could be deployed with ULAs and border locator translation >> in the edge network, so it would not be strictly accurate to suggest >> that automatic renumbering technology is a deployment dependency. > > > You are correct, it's not a requirement, but there is a large segment who > have religious objections to border locator translation (i.e., NAT). Thus, > some form of renumbering really is a requirement in the long run. >
Or use of encapsulation.... -Darrel _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
