Hi Paul,
>> 17.1. Motivation >> >> Without a new routing and addressing architecture, there is a concern >> that the cost and structure of the routing architecture as we know it >> today would become prohibitively expensive, with repercussions to the >> overall growth of the Internet. We need to avoid this and must thus >> select some solution and push forward with it. > > I know mine is a minority view, given earlier polls here, but I do > think the case for there being a problem isn't quite that settled, on > an evidential basis at least. As such, I think the above ought to > admit just a teeny bit of uncertainty. E.g.: > > "There is a general concern that the cost and structure of the > routing architecture as we know it today may become prohibitively > expensive with continued growth, with repercussions to the health > of the Internet. As such, there is an urgent need to examine and > evaluate potential scalability enhancements to it." > > However, it's your text. ;) I'm missing the distinction here. Seems like a concern is still a concern. That said, thank you, text accepted. >> growth. Our goal should be to make permanent, long-term changes to >> the architecture and those changes should be smoothly integrated, >> first-class citizens within the architecture. > > This is somewhat repeating the immediately previous? Possibly can be > compacted a little. Agreed, thanks, will address. Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
