Hi Shane, Thanks very much for your Happy Eyeballs answer in the "Re: [rrg] ILNP: existing applications & other critiques" thread to my question about why people watching the Olympics on a Comcast HFC network would sometimes have their browser, player or whatever access the videos via IPv6 servers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Eyeballs http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6555 April 2012 If the IPv4 connection is behind NAT, including with the NAT box in the provider network, and if the individual hosts have their own public unicast IPv6 addresses, then this can reduce the traffic through the IPv4 NAT box. The algorithm is designed to generally favor IPv6, with the long-term intention of reducing the use of IPv4. "... the client sends two TCP SYNs at the same time over IPv6 and IPv4." If an ACK is received for both, the client selects whether to use IPv4 or IPv6, and caches this for 10 minutes. "The simplest venue for the implementation of Happy Eyeballs is within the application itself." It seems that applications need to be altered, by the addition of a Happy Eyeballs algorithm, to provide reliable performance when the dual-stack host is connected to both IPv4 and IPv6. This is unfortunate, but not surprising - since these are two separate Internets. - Robin _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
