On 8/9/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About these methods requiring arguments? I thought you were able to
> reproduce the problems I was having and was also able to reproduce a
> working application with no arguments.

That is correct.

> By default these methods should
> not require arguments to be passed as it is unnecessary noise in the
> code.

I understand that, but that was news to me as of this thread. I spent
a couple of hours banging my head against this and found the generated
code I mentioned earlier in the thread. That's the only insight I have
to offer at this point.

> Perhaps we can continue this discussion on IRC? #rspec?

I'll pop in at one point this morning but I really don't have much in
the way of cycles to spend on this right now. I'm happy to help point
you in the right direction, but it's not very high on my priority
list. In the mean time, now that we know this is a bug, would you
kindly report it in the tracker?

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=3149&group_id=797&func=browse

> What is your s/n?
>
> On 8/9/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/9/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is it possible that rspec is not pulling the instance variables into
> > > the method because this method is being defined before instance
> > > variables in parameters are assigned to that method? I'm trying to
> > > hone down where the problem is popping up exactly. Any insight?
> >
> > Not really more than what I said earlier in this thread.
> >
> > > On 8/9/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 8/9/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Were you able to come up with any solutions?
> > > >
> > > > Nope. Anyone else?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/8/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Awesome! Thank you! :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Don't thank me yet. I've spent some time trying to track this down 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > I've found my way into some methods in routing.rb that are 
> > > > > > dynamically
> > > > > > generated (and so you can't )(*&)(*& read them to debug them quite 
> > > > > > so
> > > > > > easily) that call the methods (in your case) label_id_value and
> > > > > > id_value (being the artist id). I have no idea yet where those two
> > > > > > methods get generated. Once I do, then we can stub them. 
> > > > > > Unfortunately
> > > > > > I can't really spend any more time on this right now (though I'd 
> > > > > > love
> > > > > > to solve it).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the mean time, you'll just have to use the parameters if you want
> > > > > > the specs to work with the same code with which your app works.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/8/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I just visited the action in my browser and i don't get any 
> > > > > > > > > errors. I
> > > > > > > > > am also running on edge rails as the application relies on
> > > > > > > > > ActiveResource. Can you show me the code you created?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK - I've created a small project and am able to reproduce the
> > > > > > > > behaviour you're describing. I'll follow up when learn 
> > > > > > > > something.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > David
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > > > > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> > > > > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > > > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> > > > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> > > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to