I don't fully understand this response.. The private method I mentioned was a helper created by me in test code on the example group.
Still very interested On Feb 1, 2011 7:28 PM, "Julian Leviston" <jul...@leviston.net> wrote: Does this strike anyone else as odd? Don't you think the test should actually be written IN to the code itself? I guess I'm soft of stipulating a new language here, but perhaps Ruby is flexible enough to enable this. Surely as the private methods of a class change, the testing code HAS to change... therefore isn't it best to actually write the rspec-level tests into the classes themselves as context-sensitive-optionally loaded or not depending on whether you're in testing mode or not Julian On 02/02/2011, at 4:01 AM, James OBrien wrote: > additionally, > > since my > > foo.should_recei... _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
