On Feb 27, 2025, at 16:12, Jay Daley <exec-direc...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > >> On 28 Feb 2025, at 13:05, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: >> >> Just trying to level set here: is the way this works that you are already >> re-rendering the HTML when the metadata changes? > > > When we talk about HTML in reference to RFCs we mean two things. The first > is the HTML rendering of the RFC, as specified in an RFC, the second is the > HTML of the banner (and menu?) that is rendered along with the former to > provide a single page. So yes, the latter changes, but the former doesn’t.
Do you feel that doing so matches with what this WG agreed to in RFC 9720? | Once published, RFCs may be reissued, but the semantic content of | publication versions shall be preserved to the greatest extent | possible. For as much as I like the idea that someone sees that the RFC they asked for was obsoleted, and how to find the new one, I think that information is absolutely "semantic content". --Paul Hoffman -- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
