On 28-Feb-25 13:42, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Feb 27, 2025, at 16:12, Jay Daley <exec-direc...@ietf.org> wrote:
On 28 Feb 2025, at 13:05, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
Just trying to level set here: is the way this works that you are already
re-rendering the HTML when the metadata changes?
When we talk about HTML in reference to RFCs we mean two things. The first is
the HTML rendering of the RFC, as specified in an RFC, the second is the HTML
of the banner (and menu?) that is rendered along with the former to provide a
single page. So yes, the latter changes, but the former doesn’t.
Do you feel that doing so matches with what this WG agreed to in RFC 9720?
| Once published, RFCs may be reissued, but the semantic content of
| publication versions shall be preserved to the greatest extent
| possible.
For as much as I like the idea that someone sees that the RFC they asked for was
obsoleted, and how to find the new one, I think that information is absolutely
"semantic content".
Yes, but it would be *additional* content, and the original content is left
unchanged, as long as it's prepended.
Brian
--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
