Hi,
I think this is not a policy issue and does not deserve RSWG time. It should be
an RPC issue.
I also think it's totally wrong. It isn't fluff. By moving this important
information to the end, we would make it even less likely that people will read
it.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 24-Jul-25 04:43, [email protected] wrote:
Internet-Draft draft-thomson-rswg-bottom-fluff-00.txt is now available.
Title: Making RFC and Internet-Draft Boilerplate Less Conspicuous
Authors: Martin Thomson
David Schinazi
Name: draft-thomson-rswg-bottom-fluff-00.txt
Pages: 2
Dates: 2025-07-23
Abstract:
This document establishes a new policy for RFCs and Internet-Drafts
that moves all the fluff (copyright notices and that sort of thing)
to the bottom of documents.
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-rswg-bottom-fluff/
There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thomson-rswg-bottom-fluff-00.html
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
