On Jul 23, 2025, at 22:44, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think this is not a policy issue and does not deserve RSWG time. It should > be an RPC issue.
The structure and format of RFCs is absolutely a policy issue. Imagine if the draft instead said that the Security Considerations section always had to be before the Introduction. > I also think it's totally wrong. It isn't fluff. By moving this important > information to the end, we would make it even less likely that people will > read it. We disagree; I kinda like the idea. Having said that, the proposal is for moving the fluff for both RFCs and I-Ds to the end of the document. The RSWG cannot (as far as I can tell) make policy for Internet Drafts. --Paul Hoffman -- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
