On Fri, Jan 30, 2026, at 12:36, Alexis Rossi wrote: > I would prefer not to name a specific technology, as we're focusing on > writing policy here. As technology evolves, I'd like the RPC to be able > to change its guidance based on what best meets our policy > recommendations, and not be chained to a particular tool. Based on the > expert input, I would certainly expect the RPC to favor MathML if this > change happens - I just don't think we should put it in the RFC itself.
I agree with this. And I trust that this is what will happen... unless new information suggests a better path. That the right thing will happen seems likely enough, either way. We could recommend MathML directly, but I don't think that's necessary. (I don't think that any existing alternative will meet the requirements as we've laid them out, but maybe we'll get a <LaTeX> element in browsers that will be vastly superior.) -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
