This has some subtleties for me, too (well, maybe its not really subtleties but simply frightening me ;)). Let me try to get this back to a simple path. How about a simple
major.minor.patchlevel-dev<devlevel> So basically the "Sunday scheme" without -mf/-rc but instead just -dev. I guess the scheme was good for all, but the -mf/-rc was deemed confusing. In the sample, it would look like: 3.13.5 stable 3.14.0-dev6 (relp) 3.15.0-dev3 (relp/tcp) Now let's assume I add a bugfix for the core engine. Would that bring us to 3.13.6 stable 3.14.0-dev7 (relp) 3.15.0-dev4 (relp/tcp) Once relp is stable, we have 3.13.6 deprecated 3.14.0 stable relp 3.15.0-dev4 (relp/tcp) TLS begun: 3.13.6 deprecated 3.14.0 stable relp 3.15.0-dev4 (relp/tcp) 3.16.0-dev0 (tls) Now tcp becomes stable: 3.13.6 deprecated 3.14.0 deprecated 3.15.0 stable (relp/tcp) 3.16.0-dev0 (tls) Bottom line: versions with -dev<number> are unstable, all others are stable. Does this sound acceptable? Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
