Rainer Gerhards wrote: > So basically the "Sunday scheme" without -mf/-rc but instead just -dev. > I guess the scheme was good for all, but the -mf/-rc was deemed
Since many folks are already familiar with alpha, beta, and rc, I think it'd be good to stick with those as much as possible. > confusing. In the sample, it would look like: > 3.13.5 stable > 3.14.0-dev6 (relp) > 3.15.0-dev3 (relp/tcp) 3.13.5 stable 3.14.0-beta6 (relp) 3.15.0-alpha3 (relp/tcp) > Now let's assume I add a bugfix for the core engine. Would that bring us > to > > 3.13.6 stable > 3.14.0-dev7 (relp) > 3.15.0-dev4 (relp/tcp) 3.13.6 stable 3.14.0-beta7 (relp) 3.15.0-alpha4 (relp/tcp) > Once relp is stable, we have > > 3.13.6 deprecated > 3.14.0 stable relp > 3.15.0-dev4 (relp/tcp) 3.13.6 deprecated 3.14.0-rc1 (?) relp becoming stable 3.15.0-alpha4 (relp/tcp) > TLS begun: > 3.13.6 deprecated > 3.14.0 stable relp > 3.15.0-dev4 (relp/tcp) > 3.16.0-dev0 (tls) 3.13.6 deprecated 3.14.0 stable relp 3.15.0-beta1 (relp/tcp) (3.15 now becomes beta) 3.16.0-alpha1 (tls) (the new alpha/dev branch) In a nutshell: alpha - very (b)leading edge dev release branch beta - dev branch that has been out for awhile but still being worked on rc - the beta/dev branch finally getting ready to be declared stable, pretty much bug-fix-only at this point stable deprecated _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
