On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Andre Lorbach <alorb...@adiscon.com>wrote:
> > > > as you probably know, we get a new documentation thanks to the > > > rsyslog-doc > > > > project. I don't want to add all files individually to rsyslog. > > > > Would the following work for you > > > > > > > > a) two tarballs are being provided, one with source, one with doc > > > > b) a single tarball is provided, but it contains the doc tarball as > > > > whole > > > > c) anything else? > > > > > > > > *I* would prefer a), but not sure if that's a decent choice for > > > > other folks. Feedback appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I would prefer b), so I don't need to hunt around and get the > > > correct version of the doc that is matching the version of rsyslog. > > > It would make packaging a bit simpler as I don't need to maintain > > > another source package. > > > > > > > > looks like it's already decided, but would still love feedback from > other > > package builders. > > I would prefer (b) as well ;) > > > I think it's now clear that I should take the b) route. There are some folks that strongly prefer b) wheras the a) ballots say that b) is OK for them as well. Thanks everyone for commenting. Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
