On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2014-05-16 16:46 GMT+02:00 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I need to add that this is a simple build test, I didn't acutally do > >> any functional testing of the modules. > >> > >> > > That's known and documented in the v8 compatibility doc: > > > > http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v8compatibility.html > > Seems I completely missed that. Thanks for the link. > > >> Rainer, I'm very well aware that you are not the original author of > >> all those modules, but have you notified them at least about those > >> build failures? > >> > > > > yes. The build failures are due to the interface changes requried for v8. > > See here for details: > > > > > http://www.slideshare.net/rainergerhards1/the-rsyslog-v8-engine-developers-view > > What I meant was, if you emailed the authors of those modules. > yes, as far as I could get hold of them (the link was just for your information, but I now see it was confusing...). I am working with Brian Knox on the 0mq plugin, hopefully this will be reenabled soon. I probably need to look at omhdfs myself, but as this is always a lot of hassle and nobody yet asked, I've pushed that onto a low todo list spot. Basically, do you know if they are aware that those modules are now > broken? > > > >> The failing omgssapi module is currently what's blocking me from > >> uploading a newer Debian package. > >> > >> > > I didn't even know that it is being used outside of the Red Hat universe. > > If it really is a showblocker, I can try to get it to compile, but I > don't > > have the know-how nor the environment to build and much less to test it. > I > > had hopes that RH would update it once the move to v8. > > > > Do you know if someone actually uses it under Debian? > > Hard to say, the closest we have is popcon [0]. > > Granted, the popcon numbers for rsyslog-gssapi [1] aren't high, but > you have to take into account that popcon submissions need to be > enabled explicitly. So the actual numbers I'd expect to be higher. > What popcon numbers are interesting for though, is seeing trends and > making comparisons. > E.g. you see that the gssapi module is apparently more installed more > often then the pqsql one ("installed") but used less often ("vote"). > This might suggest that people have installed the package, but not > actually used it afterwards. > > That said, the gssapi support was enabled after an explicit user request > [2]. > > I can certainly drop the rsyslog-gssapi package again, but if that is > avoidable, I'd rather not do it. > I'll have a look at it. Probably I can get it going with just some interface fumbling. I will post resulsts when I have them (after the weekend, I guess). Rainer > > Michael > > > [0] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=rsyslog > [1] http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=rsyslog-gssapi > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493044 > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
