Guess I will need to make a dummy package for rsyslog-gnutls as i am required to install it...
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Rainer Gerhards <rgerha...@hq.adiscon.com> wrote: > I took the liberty to open a bug tracker: > > https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-pkg-ubuntu/issues/12 > > Rainer > > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Rainer Gerhards <rgerha...@hq.adiscon.com > > > wrote: > > > Why does libgt need lmnsd-gtls? At the moment, i don't see any > > relationship. . > > > > Sent from phone, thus brief. > > Am 18.08.2014 13:12 schrieb "Andre Lorbach" <alorb...@adiscon.com>: > > > > I did some research on this, and it is very simple. Rsyslog-gnutls only > >> contains one component: lmnsd_gtls.so > >> > >> But lmnsd_gtls.so is part of the base package as well, since libgt was > >> added into rsyslog base dependencies. > >> > >> The rsyslog-gnutls package was partly removed because of the conflict > >> which results from this. > >> > >> > >> > >> However for some reason, this wasn’t done in all branches and for all > >> Ubuntu dists. > >> > >> So the easiest solution in my opinion is, to remove the rsyslog-gnutls > >> package from the other branches/dists. > >> > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> Andre Lorbach > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> *From:* Rainer Gerhards [mailto:rgerha...@hq.adiscon.com] > >> *Sent:* Monday, August 18, 2014 12:38 PM > >> *To:* Andre Lorbach; rsyslog-users > >> *Subject:* Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog-gnutls v7 stable package conflicts with > >> files in rsyslog v7 stable > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Andre Lorbach <alorb...@adiscon.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> You are right, the component has moved into the RSyslog base package in > >> RSyslog v8 stable. RSyslog V7 Stable still has the package. > >> I am going to look into this. > >> > >> > >> > >> Andre, could you elaborate on the reason for the inclusion of gnutls > into > >> the base package? I wonder if this is absolutely necessary or if it > instead > >> would be better to introduce some new package. While not really > >> problematic, I think we should drag in other libs (like gnutls) only if > the > >> majority of users really needs them. Granted, gnutls is most probably > >> present in any case, so this may be a bit of pure nit-picking... > >> > >> Rainer > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
