2015-03-12 15:49 GMT+01:00 Florian Riedl <fri...@adiscon.com>: > Interesting. I am currently taking a look at this. As far as I understood > then, the current packages for RHEL/CentOS should be ok, but those for > Debian and Ubuntu are not. Is this correct so far?
Since I don't have experience with RPM packaging, take my reply with a grain of salt: RPM library package names are usually unversioned and the dependencies are calculated automatically based on the soname. If you want more fine-grained dependency information (say symbol foo was introduced in version 1.2.3), you need symbols versioning [1], for this to work properly in RPM Michael [1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/VERSION.html -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
