2016-07-27 16:41 GMT+02:00 David Lang <[email protected]>:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
>
>> That's unfortunately not the case for the Ubuntu repo. I always
>> consistently recompiled everything. Actually the problem occurs during
>> that
>> process, when e.g. liblognorm is compiled.
>
>
> I am only building for trusty, but I am using the rsyslog-pkg-ubuntu scripts
> to do the compiles, everything up to the point of uploading the results to
> the PPA
>
> are you getting the failure on trusty, or on other versions?

I get them on trusty and also on other versions. See here:

https://launchpad.net/~adiscon/+archive/ubuntu/v8-devel/+packages

I have the impression that the exact versions which fail change, but
trusty seems always affected.

Rainer
>
> David Lang
>
>> Rainer
>>
>> Sent from phone, thus brief.
>>
>> Am 27.07.2016 12:06 schrieb "David Lang" <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the elaborate output. I think we may be getting closer.
>>>> This triggered my attention:
>>>>
>>>> --> Processing Dependency: libjson-c.so.2()(64bit) for package:
>>>> liblognorm1-1.1.3-1.el6.x86_64
>>>>
>>>> I think we need to rebuild liblognorm with the new libfastjson
>>>> package. Otherwise we can see subtle problems with the json handlers,
>>>> as there core structures are different (much more in 0.99.3 than
>>>> 0.99.2 of libfastjson). This doesn't explain yet the line number
>>>> problems we saw, but in anycase that's something to look at. I will
>>>> let you know when we have updates in the repo.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, as I have been building with the git master for libfastjson and
>>> liblognorm for several months, I found that if I didn't recompile
>>> everything at once to be on the new version of libraries that both used,
>>> bad things happened.
>>>
>>> I've been suspecting that this sort of skew has been a large part of the
>>> repo problems of the last few weeks as new versions of libraries have
>>> been
>>> released at different times than rsyslog packages. I've been suspecting
>>> that if everything was recompiled, things would work (so 8.19.0 packages
>>> break with the new libraries, but I expected 8.20 packages compiled
>>> against
>>> the new libraries to then work)
>>>
>>> David Lang
>>>
>>> In parallel, I also install a CentOS6 (don't have RHEL) machine and
>>>>
>>>> see what exactly it installes when we pull from the testing repo.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again,
>>>> Rainer
>>>>
>>>> 2016-07-27 1:27 GMT+02:00 Alec Swan <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> I configured /etc/yum.repos.d/rsyslog.repo to point to the "testing"
>>>>> rsyslog repo and removed all other yum repos. After that I downloaded
>>>>> all
>>>>> RPMS from the "testing" repo using yumdownloader and installed them
>>>>> with
>>>>> "rpm -ivh". The end result is the same. The following shows the output
>>>>> of
>>>>> the test.
>>>>>
>>>>> # more /etc/yum.repos.d/rsyslog.repo
>>>>> [rsyslog_v8]
>>>>> name=Adiscon CentOS-$releasever - local packages for $basearch
>>>>> baseurl=http://rpms.adiscon.com/testing/epel-$releasever/$basearch
>>>>> enabled=1
>>>>> gpgcheck=0
>>>>> gpgkey=http://rpms.adiscon.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-Adiscon
>>>>> protect=1
>>>>>
>>>>> # yumdownloader --resolve rsyslog-mmnormalize-8.20.0
>>>>> rsyslog-elasticsearch-8.20.0 rsyslog-mmutf8fix-8.20.0
>>>>> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
>>>>> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
>>>>> ...
>>>>> rsyslog_v8
>>>>>
>>>>>   | 2.5 kB     00:00
>>>>> rsyslog_v8/primary_db
>>>>>
>>>>>  | 264 kB     00:00
>>>>> --> Running transaction check
>>>>> ---> Package rsyslog-elasticsearch.x86_64 0:8.20.0-1.el6 will be
>>>>> installed
>>>>> --> Processing Dependency: rsyslog = 8.20.0-1.el6 for package:
>>>>> rsyslog-elasticsearch-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64
>>>>> ---> Package rsyslog-mmnormalize.x86_64 0:8.20.0-1.el6 will be
>>>>> installed
>>>>> --> Processing Dependency: liblognorm.so.2()(64bit) for package:
>>>>> rsyslog-mmnormalize-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64
>>>>> ---> Package rsyslog-mmutf8fix.x86_64 0:8.20.0-1.el6 will be installed
>>>>> --> Running transaction check
>>>>> ---> Package liblognorm1.x86_64 0:1.1.3-1.el6 will be installed
>>>>> --> Processing Dependency: libjson-c.so.2()(64bit) for package:
>>>>> liblognorm1-1.1.3-1.el6.x86_64
>>>>> ---> Package rsyslog.x86_64 0:8.20.0-1.el6 will be installed
>>>>> --> Processing Dependency: libfastjson.so.4()(64bit) for package:
>>>>> rsyslog-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64
>>>>> --> Running transaction check
>>>>> ---> Package json-c.x86_64 0:0.11-11.el6 will be installed
>>>>> ---> Package libfastjson4.x86_64 0:0.99.3-2.el6 will be installed
>>>>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>>>> rsyslog-mmnormalize-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>>  |  13 kB     00:00
>>>>> rsyslog-elasticsearch-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>>  |  24 kB     00:00
>>>>> rsyslog-mmutf8fix-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>>  |  12 kB     00:00
>>>>> rsyslog-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>>  | 690 kB     00:00
>>>>> json-c-0.11-11.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>>  |  51 kB     00:00
>>>>> libfastjson4-0.99.3-2.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>>   |  46 kB     00:00
>>>>> liblognorm1-1.1.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>>   |  46 kB     00:00
>>>>>
>>>>> # ls
>>>>> json-c-0.11-11.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> liblognorm1-1.1.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>  rsyslog-elasticsearch-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>  rsyslog-mmutf8fix-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> libfastjson4-0.99.3-2.el6.x86_64.rpm  rsyslog-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> rsyslog-mmnormalize-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>> # rpm -ivh *.rpm
>>>>> warning: libfastjson4-0.99.3-2.el6.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1
>>>>> Signature, key ID e00b8985: NOKEY
>>>>> Preparing...                ###########################################
>>>>> [100%]
>>>>>    1:libfastjson4           ###########################################
>>>>> [
>>>>> 14%]
>>>>>    2:rsyslog                ###########################################
>>>>> [
>>>>> 29%]
>>>>>    3:json-c                 ###########################################
>>>>> [
>>>>> 43%]
>>>>>    4:liblognorm1            ###########################################
>>>>> [
>>>>> 57%]
>>>>>    5:rsyslog-mmnormalize    ###########################################
>>>>> [
>>>>> 71%]
>>>>>    6:rsyslog-elasticsearch  ###########################################
>>>>> [
>>>>> 86%]
>>>>>    7:rsyslog-mmutf8fix      ###########################################
>>>>> [100%]
>>>>>
>>>>> # service rsyslog start
>>>>> Starting system logger:                                    [  OK  ]
>>>>>
>>>>> # ps -ax | grep rsys
>>>>> Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See
>>>>> /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.8/FAQ
>>>>>  1020 pts/0    S+     0:00 grep rsys
>>>>>
>>>>> # dmesg
>>>>> ...
>>>>> rs:main Q:Reg[1009]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f79a5e4d2b6 sp
>>>>> 00007f799e66f7e8
>>>>> error 4 in libc-2.12.so[7f79a5d25000+18a000]
>>>>>
>>>>> # service rsyslog start
>>>>> Starting system logger:                                    [  OK  ]
>>>>>
>>>>> # dmesg
>>>>> ...
>>>>> rs:main Q:Reg[1009]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f79a5e4d2b6 sp
>>>>> 00007f799e66f7e8
>>>>> error 4 in libc-2.12.so[7f79a5d25000+18a000]
>>>>> rs:main Q:Reg[1063]: segfault at 1b ip 00007f9a44249778 sp
>>>>> 00007f9a3c1de878
>>>>> error 6 in libfastjson.so.4.0.0[7f9a44246000+9000]
>>>>>
>>>>> # service rsyslog start
>>>>> Starting system logger:                                    [  OK  ]
>>>>>
>>>>> # dmesg
>>>>> ...
>>>>> rs:main Q:Reg[1009]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f79a5e4d2b6 sp
>>>>> 00007f799e66f7e8
>>>>> error 4 in libc-2.12.so[7f79a5d25000+18a000]
>>>>> rs:main Q:Reg[1063]: segfault at 1b ip 00007f9a44249778 sp
>>>>> 00007f9a3c1de878
>>>>> error 6 in libfastjson.so.4.0.0[7f9a44246000+9000]
>>>>> rs:main Q:Reg[1093]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f32e00c22b6 sp
>>>>> 00007f32d88e47e8
>>>>> error 4 in libc-2.12.so[7f32dff9a000+18a000]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alec
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Rainer Gerhards <
>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 26.07.2016 17:58 schrieb "Alec Swan" <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I downloaded the packages from adiscon "testing" repo, then uploaded
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>> to our local Nexus repo and then installed them with yum. So, the
>>>>>>> source
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> our local Nexus repo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, the "testing" repo does not seem to have libee.so
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> dependency
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> required by libfastjson, so I can't just use "testing" repo to
>>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> all
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rsyslog dependencies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Something is fishy here. I just checked the spec file, and libfastjson
>>>>>> does
>>>>>> not have a dependency on libee. Is there a problem with the staging
>>>>>> process? Or can you try from the original repo, not the mirror?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alec
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Rainer Gerhards <
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-07-26 17:35 GMT+02:00 Alec Swan <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rainer, per Florian's request in "experimental rpms for
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rsyslog-8.20.0" I
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> downloaded RPMs from the "testing" repo baseurl=
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://rpms.adiscon.com/testing/epel-$releasever/$basearch
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you check where the system says it actually installed them from.
>>>>>>>> The line numbers do not match the RPMs Florian created, thus I ask.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alec
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Rainer Gerhards <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I today tried quite a while to reproduce the issue with your
>>>>>>>>> config,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> unfortunately without any success. For now, I conclude that this
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> not a general problem, but one induced by your environment and
>>>>>>>>>> data.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have then looked again at the traces and the few line numbers it
>>>>>>>>>> contains. Now comes the interesting fact. I notice that there is a
>>>>>>>>>> mismatch between the line numbers shown and the code that actually
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> used to build the packages (judging from git and the source RPMs).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wonder what might have gone wrong here. Can you please let me know
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> which exact repro you installed from and potentially which other
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> repos
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you have configured on that machine. It might also be useful to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the system from where exactly the packages have ben installed. I
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1], which hopefully helps to get that information.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Once I have this information, I can check if there are any version
>>>>>>>>>> quirks (note that commit [2] fixed a situation that could cause
>>>>>>>>>> exactly what you see). If there is no issue with the package
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> sources,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I unfortunately need your help in further troubleshooting this in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> environment. But let's first see what the repo check will bring up.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://serverfault.com/questions/62026/how-to-know-from-which-yum-repository-a-package-has-been-installed
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/rsyslog/libfastjson/commit/0499ec8df09c913156ead426c171031b566dbe7d
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-23 19:28 GMT+02:00 Alec Swan <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, that should be OK. Is there a link to the build server/CI
>>>>>>>>>>> env
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> use?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alec
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Rainer Gerhards <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. Would it be OK for your if a somewhat mangled version of
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> configs show up inside the testbench? I think about adding a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> test for it, that would be great for the future as well. I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> try to strip it a bit down (e.g. no ES but writing to file, which
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> would enable runs on all CI environments and when no ES is
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- I assume this would also trigger the bug).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-22 17:46 GMT+02:00 Alec Swan <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rainer, I attached /etc/rsyslog.conf and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> /etc/rsyslog.d/rsyslog-custom.conf
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alec
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Rainer Gerhards <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunately, we do not seem to have debug symbols, so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> much more. Can you share your full config (including all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes, if
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> any)? Maybe I can get it to abort in my lab as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-21 22:02 GMT+02:00 Alec Swan <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rainer, here is the output from running rsyslog under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valgrind:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [root valgrind-3.11.0]# valgrind rsyslogd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== Memcheck, a memory error detector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seward
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> et
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> al.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copyright
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> info
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== Command: rsyslogd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value(s)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    at 0x16A414: cnfexprDestruct (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    by 0x16B36D: cnfstmtOptimize (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    by 0x146317: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    by 0x12E5BE: llExecFunc (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    by 0x146176: rulesetOptimizeAll (in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2371==    by 0x123EF6: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    by 0x158A68: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    by 0x159008: main (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== Warning: invalid file descriptor 99990 in syscall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close()
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ==2371==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== HEAP SUMMARY:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==     in use at exit: 209,122 bytes in 2,121 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==   total heap usage: 11,004 allocs, 8,883 frees,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,319,525
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> allocated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== LEAK SUMMARY:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    definitely lost: 26 bytes in 1 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==      possibly lost: 88 bytes in 2 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==    still reachable: 209,008 bytes in 2,118 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaked
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -v
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== Use --track-origins=yes to see where uninitialised
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> come
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2371== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (suppressed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 114
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> from 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [root valgrind-3.11.0]# ==2375== Thread 6 rs:main Q:Reg:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== Invalid read of size 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    at 0x56607BE: fjson_object_iter_next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (json_object_iterator.c:119)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x5660863: fjson_object_iter_begin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (json_object_iterator.c:77)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x126F09: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1270A0: msgAddJSON (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x7242F2D: ??? (in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /lib64/rsyslog/mmnormalize.so)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14EA64: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14F561: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14F923: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x146AB6: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1473DA: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x156FE3: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1457D8: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==  Address 0xf57d338 is 0 bytes after a block of size
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 72
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> alloc'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    at 0x4A05FEF: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x7659871: json_object_new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (json_object.c:178)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x765A61A: json_object_new_object
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (json_object.c:354)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x744A355: ln_normalize (in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /usr/lib64/liblognorm.so.2.0.0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x7242EEB: ??? (in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /lib64/rsyslog/mmnormalize.so)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14EA64: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14F561: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14F923: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x146AB6: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1473DA: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x156FE3: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1457D8: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== Invalid read of size 4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    at 0x5660778: fjson_object_get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (json_object.c:176)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x126F57: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1270A0: msgAddJSON (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x7242F2D: ??? (in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /lib64/rsyslog/mmnormalize.so)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14EA64: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14F561: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14F923: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x146AB6: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1473DA: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x156FE3: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1457D8: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x13FB5D: wtiWorker (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==  Address 0x60000001e is not stack'd, malloc'd or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (recently)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> free'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== Process terminating with default action of signal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (SIGSEGV)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==  Access not within mapped region at address
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0x60000001E
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==    at 0x5660778: fjson_object_get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (json_object.c:176)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x126F57: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1270A0: msgAddJSON (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x7242F2D: ??? (in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /lib64/rsyslog/mmnormalize.so)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14EA64: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14F561: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x14F923: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x146AB6: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1473DA: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x156FE3: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x1457D8: ??? (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    by 0x13FB5D: wtiWorker (in /sbin/rsyslogd)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==  If you believe this happened as a result of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==  The main thread stack size used in this run was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10485760.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ==2375==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== HEAP SUMMARY:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==     in use at exit: 2,611,014 bytes in 11,732
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==   total heap usage: 27,013 allocs, 15,281 frees,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8,524,299
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> allocated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== LEAK SUMMARY:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    definitely lost: 4,117 bytes in 11 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    indirectly lost: 24,922 bytes in 20 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==      possibly lost: 4,464 bytes in 12 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==    still reachable: 2,577,511 bytes in 11,689
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==2375==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaked
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -v
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== Use --track-origins=yes to see where uninitialised
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> come
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==2375== ERROR SUMMARY: 5 errors from 3 contexts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (suppressed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 120
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> from 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [root valgrind-3.11.0]# rsyslogd -v
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rsyslogd 8.20.0, compiled with:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PLATFORM: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PLATFORM (lsb_release -d):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FEATURE_REGEXP: Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GSSAPI Kerberos 5 support: No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FEATURE_DEBUG (debug build, slow code): No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32bit Atomic operations supported: Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 64bit Atomic operations supported: Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> memory allocator: system default
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Runtime Instrumentation (slow code): No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uuid support: Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Number of Bits in RainerScript integers: 64
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See http://www.rsyslog.com for more information.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [root valgrind-3.11.0]# dmesg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rs:main Q:Reg[1776]: segfault at 65 ip 00007f0769bcc2b6 sp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00007f0762de87e8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error 4 in libc-2.12.so[7f0769aa4000+18a000]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alec
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rainer Gerhards <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-20 23:02 GMT+02:00 Alec Swan <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I used test RPMs to upgrade from 8.19.0 to 8.20.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> when I
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> start rsyslog it logs the following error message to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmesg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> shuts
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rsyslog down:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rs:main Q:Reg[23801]: segfault at 1a ip 00007fa95ac9f778
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 00007fa94f5fd878 error 6 in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libfastjson.so.4.0.0[7fa95ac9c000+9000]"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These are the packages that were installed/updated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jul 20 20:53:11 yum[22693]: Installed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libfastjson4-0.99.3-2.el6.x86_64
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jul 20 20:53:11 yum[22693]: Updated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rsyslog-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jul 20 20:53:11 yum[22693]: Updated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rsyslog-mmutf8fix-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jul 20 20:53:11 yum[22693]: Updated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rsyslog-mmnormalize-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jul 20 20:53:11 yum[22693]: Updated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rsyslog-elasticsearch-8.20.0-1.el6.x86_64
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would it be possible that you do a run under valgrind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alec
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Michael Biebl <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-12 23:12 GMT+02:00 David Lang <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fwiw, this is the first release I felt comfortable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> uploading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debian unstable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It just hit the archive a few hours ago:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libfastjson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope we don't break the API that much anymore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm now waiting for a liblognorm 1.1.4 release which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compiles
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> against
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libfastjson 0.99.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My understanding is that we are going to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liblognorm 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> cycle
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being delayed for the last couple of cycles)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, so what's the plan here? Which liblognorm version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> pick?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> At least they currently released version doesn't compile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> latest libfastjson release (which is not a surprise,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> API
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> rework, which I'm thankful for).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intelligent
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> universe are pointed away from Earth?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ARCHIVED
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> by a
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> myriad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> POST if
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ARCHIVED
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> myriad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> POST if
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ARCHIVED
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> by a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> myriad
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> POST if
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DON'T LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to