EVERYONE isn't down on TPOTUS/CIC, Mike.
If you think back not too long ago, Clinton was under
attack from one faction or the other, every day of the
week for eight years. Not EVERYONE mind you, but
it was CONSTANTLY someone.

When WMD are finally found, that won't stop the criticism.
The critics will just move on to the next act/scene in the
script. I have followed politics, current events, etc., closely
since circa 1976. Based on my observations, this kind of
shit never ends, and it doesn't matter who TPOTUS is.

Mark my words: When the WMD issue is finally resolved,
all we'll hear about DAY and NIGHT will be the state of
our economy. None of this really bothers me. In fact I hope
I get to listen to the sniveling little shits another 5 1/2 years!

JT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [RollTideFan] Is Lying About The Reason For War An Impeachable
Offense?


> I'm so tried of everyone down on our President and Commander in Chief,
> did any one stop and think that the WMD's are no longer in Iraq, but could
> have been shipped to Syria or another country for safe keeping so they
could
> be used at a later date by that country. Saddam hasn't been
> captured or confirmed dead yet, why do think there is still the on going
> attacks on our troops the head of snake hasnt been chopped off yet.
> Mike H
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "SAR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 5:59 PM
> Subject: [RollTideFan] Is Lying About The Reason For War An Impeachable
> Offense?
>
>
> > President George W. Bush has got a very serious problem. Before asking
> Congress for a
> > Joint Resolution authorizing the use of American military forces in
Iraq,
> he made a
> > number of unequivocal statements about the reason the United States
needed
> to pursue
> > the most radical actions any nation can undertake - acts of war against
> another
> > nation.
> > Now it is clear that many of his statements appear to be false. In the
> past, Bush's
> > White House has been very good at sweeping ugly issues like this under
the
> carpet, and
> > out of sight. But it is not clear that they will be able to make the
> question of what
> > happened to Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) go
away -
> unless,
> > perhaps, they start another war. ...  $#%&@Snip
> >
> > http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20030606.html
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > RollTideFan - The University of Alabama Athletics Discussion List
> >
> > "Welcome to RollTideFan! Wear a cup!"
> >
> > To join or leave the list or to make changes to your subscription visit
> http://listinfo.rolltidefan.net
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> RollTideFan - The University of Alabama Athletics Discussion List
>
> "Welcome to RollTideFan! Wear a cup!"
>
> To join or leave the list or to make changes to your subscription visit
http://listinfo.rolltidefan.net


______________________________________________________
RollTideFan - The University of Alabama Athletics Discussion List

"Welcome to RollTideFan! Wear a cup!"

To join or leave the list or to make changes to your subscription visit 
http://listinfo.rolltidefan.net

Reply via email to