> 1. The discussion should be based on realistic assumptions. > Discussions not based on realistic assumptions often turn out to > be a waste of time. > > 2. The solution space should be within the range of deployable > options. > > Discussions on many topics in the research world too often fails to > adhere to these. The IRTF Routing Requirements WG is a good example, > with the occasional proposals to completely replace routing with pet > ideas and inability to stick to the deployable solution space.
Curtis, You're correct, we're generally in agreement except that we have completely different expectations of what the words 'realistic' and 'deployable' mean in a research context vs. an engineering context. I propose that we agree to disagree. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
