Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > > > > Hi Mathias,
> > > > >
> > > > > I got some differences. The route table seems better:
> > > > >
> > > > > Host Routing Table
> > > > > Hash    Destination     HW Address              Device
> > > > > 00      0.0.0.0         00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> > > > > 01      10.0.1.1        00:1B:21:05:0C:B6       rteth0
> > > > > 01      10.0.0.1        00:1B:21:05:0C:FC       rteth1
> > > > > 01      127.0.0.1       00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> > > > > 02      10.0.1.2        00:1B:21:05:0C:B6       rteth1
> > > > > 02      10.0.0.2        00:17:F2:26:BC:1C       rteth0
> > > > > 03      10.0.0.3        00:17:F2:26:BC:1C       rteth0
> > > > > 3F      10.0.1.255      FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF       rteth1
> > > > > 3F      10.0.0.255      FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF       rteth0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > no entry from 10.0.0.1 to the loopback device.
> > > >
> > > > That's because of your rtroute solicit loop: You are requesting also
> > > > 10.0.0.1 to be resolved over rteth0, thus the entry for rtlo gets
> > > > deleted while no one answers on your IP on the cable.
> > >
> > > ok, but the wait of 3 seconds has been important because the table
> route
> > > is
> > > different. Now is "correct" I think.
> >
> > I didn't followed this thread until now, but I think you are using e1000
> > and you need an delay to get it working?! Then check this out:
> > http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/RTnet:rt_e1000
> 
> Hi,
> 
> testing again, using rtnet trunk updated 20 minuts ago and compiled
> against 
> 2.6.23 xenomai-rc5 (and e1000 file patched)
> 
> if I comment the sleep 3 seconds in my script I got this route table:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/rtnet$ sudo ./load_rtnet
> Host Routing Table
> Hash    Destination     HW Address              Device
> 00      0.0.0.0         00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> 01      10.0.1.1        00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> 01      10.0.0.1        00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> 01      127.0.0.1       00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> 02      10.0.1.2        00:1B:21:05:0C:B6       rteth1
> 02      10.0.0.2        00:1B:21:05:0C:FC       rteth0
> 3F      10.0.1.255      FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF       rteth1
> 3F      10.0.0.255      FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF       rteth0
> 
> 
> if I put an sleep of 3 seconds (as Mathias said) I got this table route:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/rtnet$ sudo ./load_rtnet
> Host Routing Table
> Hash    Destination     HW Address              Device
> 00      0.0.0.0         00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> 01      10.0.1.1        00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> 01      10.0.0.1        00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> 01      127.0.0.1       00:00:00:00:00:00       rtlo
> 02      10.0.1.2        00:1B:21:05:0C:B6       rteth1
> 02      10.0.0.2        00:1B:21:05:0C:FC       rteth0
> 3F      10.0.1.255      FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF       rteth1
> 3F      10.0.0.255      FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF       rteth0
> 
> 
> I cannot understand .... yesterday I got a different route table .... this
> is 
> crazy ...

So it seems that you didn't use the latest RTnet SVN version last time, because 
now you get the same routing table no matter if you put a sleep or not.

Karl
-- 
von Karl Reichert

Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! 
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to