A Dijous 15 Novembre 2007, Karl Reichert va escriure: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: yesterday > > > > > > Host Routing Table > > > > > > Hash Destination HW Address Device > > > > > > 00 0.0.0.0 00:00:00:00:00:00 rtlo > > > > > > 01 10.0.1.1 00:1B:21:05:0C:B6 rteth0 > > > > > > 01 10.0.0.1 00:1B:21:05:0C:FC rteth1 > > > > > > 01 127.0.0.1 00:00:00:00:00:00 rtlo > > > > > > 02 10.0.1.2 00:1B:21:05:0C:B6 rteth1 > > > > > > 02 10.0.0.2 00:17:F2:26:BC:1C rteth0 > > > > > > 03 10.0.0.3 00:17:F2:26:BC:1C rteth0 > > > > > > 3F 10.0.1.255 FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF rteth1 > > > > > > 3F 10.0.0.255 FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF rteth0 > > > > > >
the syslog show:rtnet 0.9.10 quasar:~# grep "RTnet 0." /var/log/syslog.* /var/log/syslog.0:Nov 14 12:31:11 quasar kernel: *** RTnet 0.9.10 - built on Nov 13 2007 17:40:50 *** .... today > > > > > > > > > > > > no entry from 10.0.0.1 to the loopback device. > > Hash Destination HW Address Device > > 00 0.0.0.0 00:00:00:00:00:00 rtlo > > 01 10.0.1.1 00:00:00:00:00:00 rtlo > > 01 10.0.0.1 00:00:00:00:00:00 rtlo > > 01 127.0.0.1 00:00:00:00:00:00 rtlo > > 02 10.0.1.2 00:1B:21:05:0C:B6 rteth1 > > 02 10.0.0.2 00:1B:21:05:0C:FC rteth0 > > 3F 10.0.1.255 FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF rteth1 > > 3F 10.0.0.255 FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF rteth0 > > So it seems that you didn't use the latest RTnet SVN version last time, > because now you get the same routing table no matter if you put a sleep or > not. I have done an svn up without any update ... anyway, today, now I'm using rtnet trunk updated and I have a erroneous rtroute table. Any ideas? Regards, Leo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
