A Dilluns 19 Novembre 2007, Jan Kiszka va escriure:
> Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after recompiling the kernel (2.6.23) and xenomai (trunk) and rtnet
> > (trunk) I'm having the same problems. So, I would like to delimite them.
> > Trying to use the rtcap, I got that wireshark doesn't see it. I have done
> > the following steps. Please could you look it if I'm missing something
> > obvious?
> >
> > mknod /dev/rtnet c 10 240;
> > insmod modules/rtnet.ko;
> > insmod modules/rtipv4.ko;
> > insmod modules/rtpacket.ko;
> > insmod modules/rt_e1000.ko;
> > insmod modules/rtcap.ko;
> > sudo ./sbin/rtifconfig rteth0 up 10.0.0.1 promisc netmask 255.255.255.0;
> >
> > doing this if I run wireshark, rteth0 doesn¡t appears as interface. I can
> > see only eth1 , lo and any.
> >
> > Please,
> > what I'm doing wrong?
>
> ifconfig rteth0 up
> etc.
> (the RTcap sniffing interfaces show up as a pseudo network devices under
> Linux).

:-(

please Jan, could you add this sentence to the readme.rtcap documentation? 
Because although the documentations says:

After these shadow devices are started up using ifconfig 
[.......]
switched to promiscuous mode when it is configured:

    rtifconfig <rtdevX> up <IP> promisc


I understand all the time that the device is started by rtifconfig in promisc 
and not that I _must_ rtifconfig + promisc and after ifconfig rteth0

Regards,

Leo

PS maybe I could see what is happen with the controller ping ...



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to