Hi, now that I can play more with rtnet I have more doubts that I would like to share to try to find the light in this dark path ....
- first of all, it's convenient that I erase /dev/rtnet every time that I unloaded rtnet? - I have found a correct route table playing with the times and the order. For example, this script shows a correct route table. This is normal? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh echo "Creating the device" mknod /dev/rtnet c 10 240; echo "Loading rtnet module" insmod /usr/local/rtnet/modules/rtnet.ko; echo "Loading rtipv4 module" insmod /usr/local/rtnet/modules/rtipv4.ko; echo "Loading rtpacket module" insmod /usr/local/rtnet/modules/rtpacket.ko; echo "Loading rt_loopback module" insmod /usr/local/rtnet/modules/rt_loopback.ko; echo "Loading rt_e1000 driver" insmod /usr/local/rtnet/modules/rt_e1000.ko; echo "Loading the capture interface module" insmod /usr/local/rtnet/modules/rtcap.ko; echo "Configuring the loopback" /usr/local/rtnet/sbin/rtifconfig rtlo up 127.0.0.1 echo "Configuring the rteth0 interface" /usr/local/rtnet/sbin/rtifconfig rteth0 up 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0; echo "Waiting 4 seconds ...." sleep 4; echo "Configuring the rteth1 interface" /usr/local/rtnet/sbin/rtifconfig rteth1 up 10.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0; echo "Waiting 4 seconds ...." sleep 4; echo "Attaching explicit to the rteth0 interface" for((i=1;i<5;i++)); do /usr/local/rtnet/sbin/rtroute add 10.0.0.$i 00:1b:21:05:0c:fc dev rteth0; echo "Attached 10.0.0.$i to rteth0" done echo "Attaching explicit to the rteth1 interface" for((i=1;i<5;i++)); do /usr/local/rtnet/sbin/rtroute add 10.0.1.$i 00:1b:21:05:0c:b6 dev rteth1; echo "Attached 10.0.1.$i to rteth1" done echo "The final route table" /usr/local/rtnet/sbin/rtroute ------------------------------------------------------------- - I was playing with rtnet some time ago but with rtai. I looked the examples. Now, I'm trying to play with xenomai, but I have found that the examples some two folders: native and posix. The native use the rt**** calls but the posix use a _normal_ net calls. Looking on the wiki, I have found this: TODO: explain differences of native rt_dev_xxx vs. POSIX service calls (with Xenomai) could someone tell me something? Probably it's no the same, but this means that in xenomai I can use normal net calls to use a rtnet interface in realtime? Regards, Leo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
