A Dijous 22 Novembre 2007, Karl Reichert va escriure: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > > TODO: explain differences of native rt_dev_xxx vs. POSIX service > > > > calls (with Xenomai) > > > > > > > > could someone tell me something? Probably it's no the same, but this > > > > means that in xenomai I can use normal net calls to use a rtnet > > > > interface > > > > > > in realtime? > > > > > > 1) Independent of RTnet, Xenomai application can call into normal > > > networking services of Linux. They just loose timing guarantees at that > > > point. > > > > ok > > > > > 2) The programming model of the POSIX skin allows you to use socket > > > functions as if you are writing a normal Linux application. In case > > > your calls address a service which RTnet provides (UDP or AF_PACKET) > > > and RTnet is loaded, it will handle it for you under realtime > > > constraints. Services unknown to RTnet are passed through to Linux, > > > without timing guarantees. BTW, the same pattern works for AF_CAN. > > > > good .... this piece of text should be added to the wiki. I will be very > > clarify ... > > > > Regards, > > > > Leo > > Leo, if you think so, please create an account at xenomai.org and add this > to the wiki. A work of 10 minutes, and you would give back sth to the > xenomai community.
I cannot create an account to the wiki: .................................................................... out of captcha images; this shouldn't happen regards, Leo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
