Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > TODO: explain differences of native rt_dev_xxx vs. POSIX service calls > > > (with Xenomai) > > > > > > could someone tell me something? Probably it's no the same, but this > > > means that in xenomai I can use normal net calls to use a rtnet > interface > > > in realtime? > > > > 1) Independent of RTnet, Xenomai application can call into normal > > networking services of Linux. They just loose timing guarantees at that > > point. > > ok > > > 2) The programming model of the POSIX skin allows you to use socket > > functions as if you are writing a normal Linux application. In case your > > calls address a service which RTnet provides (UDP or AF_PACKET) and > > RTnet is loaded, it will handle it for you under realtime constraints. > > Services unknown to RTnet are passed through to Linux, without timing > > guarantees. BTW, the same pattern works for AF_CAN. > > good .... this piece of text should be added to the wiki. I will be very > clarify ... > > Regards, > > Leo
Leo, if you think so, please create an account at xenomai.org and add this to the wiki. A work of 10 minutes, and you would give back sth to the xenomai community. Thanks Karl -- von Karl Reichert GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
