On 13-Sep-09, at 7:32 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> Rails 2.3.4 i18n module certainly allows me to do what I want. I just > don't think it is the best way of approaching the full message control > in validations. And I'm really concerned in trying to make Rails be as > simple as possible in my demonstration to the company where I work, > when > I have the opportunity to talk about Rails. The goal of the 2.3.4 I18n changes wasn't to implement the ideal system, but to make possible things that were previously not possible. We plan on coming up with a better solution for 3.0, and it would be better for you to get involved in that discussion than work on a patch that may never get accepted (The reasons for which Jose and Sven both covered in the lighthouse thread you linked earlier). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
