On 10 Nov 2008, at 22:32, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

>
> Yeah, you're right, sorry, thanks so much for your help. Probably for
> the best that i changed the model name from Request anyway, might as
> well commit that to my svn since it's advertised as a Rails reserved
> word.
>
> I just posted this to the forum with a different subject, since it  
> ended
> up having nothing to do with this, but. But I was forced to really get
> down and dirty with my testing, and it turns out it's because I had
> over-ridden [] and []= on one of the models involved. I got away with
> that in Rails 1 (perhaps AR didn't used to use these methods?), but  
> not
> in Rails 2.  Okay, more refactoring, this one's even more of a pain  
> then
> the last one. Oh well, I guess I was being too clever before.
>
Rails has always provided [] and []= for getting/setting  
attributes. :include was largely rewritten in 2.1 and does indeed use  
[] to read attributess, the corresponding bits of 2.0 or 1.2 obviously  
didn't

Fred

> Jonathan
>
> Frederick Cheung wrote:
>> On 10 Nov 2008, at 21:04, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, just changing the model name from Request to AppRequest doesn't
>>> seem to have done it.
>>>
>>> I tried to leave the (many) associations pointing to AppRequest (nee
>>> Request) the same, but specify a :class_name and :foreign_key.
>>>
>>> It sounds like maybe "request" as the name of an assocation, even  
>>> when
>>> not the name of the model, is a no-no too?
>>
>> I'm not convinced that has anything to do with this at all. If you
>> could post your teeny tiny example I might be able to work out what  
>> is
>> going in (given that I wrote the code behind include in 2.1.2)
>>
>> Fred
>
> -- 
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to