Hi, I'm playing with RoR since Ruby 1.0, now I'm playing with 3.2.
I have to merge/rewrite one ERP from standalone app client/server to web approach. Some of this part is made with PHP, but this part is not the most important, and there is an option that we can rewrite it to other tools like RoR as some parts have to change. The main question is why I should choose RoR over other framework PHP like Kohana or Yii. I don't want to start a fight here, I want to ask very specific questions: - Is it true that a slow queriy on RoR lock all other concurrent connections? This was true on old RoR versions. I usualy have my RoR served by Ngix with Thin. Apahe can serve PHP directly. This extra layer (Thin, mongrel,...) has some penalty on RoR ? I know I can have many Thins servers listening and Ngix uses them by demand, or use Passenger, Unicorn, ... but those options are slowering the web in comparation with Apache and PHP? I prefer to use RoR but I have to convince the other programmer and my Boss, both of them prefer Php because sound better, there are more developers, bla bla bla Of course the best is what I'm doing, creating a RoR and Kohana web tot test this very specific questions, but it's aways good to ask and read from profressionals like you :-) thanks, -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
