Nick Gins wrote: > Robert Walker wrote: >> Nick Gins wrote: >>> My current rationale for allowing the second person to bump the first >>> person is to get them annoyed enough for them to have 2 separate user >> >> Well, I hope you have a captive audience. The first time a site >> "annoyed" me in the manner would be the last time I'd use the site. If I >> had any choice in the matter anyway. > > I do have a very exclusive market for my site as this is really a > project for a very niche market for a larger company. The annoyance > factor is to prevent them from hurting themselves by creating a single > user account for their office and just entering all the data by several > different people at the same time and then reporting against that. Not > good.
If users will be "hurting themselves", then they won't do it. If you annoy your users, you will lose your users. I totally agree with Robert here. In other words: provide obvious rewards for doing it the right way. Don't provide deliberate annoyance for doing it the wrong way. > > I need help with a code example. Thank you for the help, but I need > help with a visual example so I can see how it's done. > Just don't. > Thank you, > > Nick Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
