Thanks Fred. I just posted a separate thread on this, but will ask here. I cannot install Rails 3.1 with Ruby 1.8.7 because it complains:
Installing linecache19 (0.5.12) Gem::InstallError: linecache19 requires Ruby version >= 1.9.2. So, is it the case that Rails 3.1 actually requires Ruby 1.9.2? Thanks again, Kevin On Nov 15, 5:02 am, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 14, 11:47 pm, KevinC <kevinch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I'm stumped. Anyone have any timeout problems with ruby 1.9.3? The > > problem is, if I want to useRails3.1, I have to use Ruby 1.9.3, > > which now breaks all of my oldRails2 apps. > > > I'd appreciate any help. > > I've no idea about the actual problem, but you should be able to > use1.8.7withrails3.1- the release notes (http:// > guides.rubyonrails.org/3_1_release_notes.html) explicitly say so. In > additionrails3.1came out something like 2 months before 1.9.3. > > You might also want to consider using something like rbenv or rvm so > that you can juggle multiple versions of ruby for when you do have > projects compatible only with certain versions of ruby. > > Fred -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
