On Nov 16, 2:33 pm, KevinC <kevinch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Fred. I just posted a separate thread on this, but will ask > here. I cannot install Rails 3.1 with Ruby 1.8.7 because it > complains: > > Installing linecache19 (0.5.12) > Gem::InstallError: linecache19 requires Ruby version >= 1.9.2. >
Do you have linecache19 or ruby-debug19 in your gem file? Those are ruby 1.9 specific (linecache and ruby-debug are the 1.8.7 equivalents). I can certainly run an (admittedly trivial) rails 3.1.1 app on ruby 1.8.7 Fred > So, is it the case that Rails 3.1 actually requires Ruby 1.9.2? > > Thanks again, > Kevin > > On Nov 15, 5:02 am, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Nov 14, 11:47 pm, KevinC <kevinch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'm stumped. Anyone have any timeout problems with ruby 1.9.3? The > > > problem is, if I want to useRails3.1, I have to use Ruby 1.9.3, > > > which now breaks all of my oldRails2 apps. > > > > I'd appreciate any help. > > > I've no idea about the actual problem, but you should be able to > > use1.8.7withrails3.1- the release notes (http:// > > guides.rubyonrails.org/3_1_release_notes.html) explicitly say so. In > > additionrails3.1came out something like 2 months before 1.9.3. > > > You might also want to consider using something like rbenv or rvm so > > that you can juggle multiple versions of ruby for when you do have > > projects compatible only with certain versions of ruby. > > > Fred -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
