On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Nate Bragg <jonathan.br...@alum.rpi.edu> wrote: > Just wanted to say, to those of you who are concerned about the build time, > that at least for you it builds in under an hour. > > I just built 0.4, and it took almost exactly 25 hours. > > One more sign that I should upgrade my computer. ;^)
I'm guessing this is a sign that you don't have enough physical memory to build Rust > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:20 PM, John Mija <jon...@proinbox.com> wrote: >> >> This email is related to one sent to the Go mailing list[1] about the >> great difference in compiling time between Rust which took 50 minutes, >> and Go with a time of 2 minutes in build compiler, all libraries, all >> commands and testing. >> >> It looks that it is possible because it has been written in C, instead >> of use C++. It is also interesting to know that the Go compiler has been >> based in the Plan9 C compilers[2]. >> >> >> [1]: >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/golang-nuts/bKDfVp0dzKw >> [2]: http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/new_c_compilers/ >> http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/compiler >> >> Note: do not take this email like negative, I only hope that Rust can go >> to better in time. >> _______________________________________________ >> Rust-dev mailing list >> Rust-dev@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > -- Tim Chevalier * http://catamorphism.org/ * Often in error, never in doubt 'Wouldn't you rather be anything other than the kid who runs around telling stuff what he thinks it is?" -- DavEnd _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
