Klutzy helped me through a bunch of issues tonight and I am now building stage 
2 from HEAD using GCC 4.8. I put the procedure I used up on the GitHub wiki for 
others to try and also linked it from the main getting started page: " 
https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Note-Building-Rust-Before-0.8-on-Windows-Systems
 . Huge thanks for Klutzy helping me out.
Aaron@GIR /c/projects/rust/i686-pc-mingw32/stage2/bin$ rustc.exe hello.rs
Aaron@GIR /c/projects/rust/i686-pc-mingw32/stage2/bin$ helloHello, world.
> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 14:33:41 +0900
> From: klutzytheklu...@gmail.com
> To: vadi...@gmail.com
> CC: rust-dev@mozilla.org
> Subject: Re: [rust-dev] Windows Users can build Rust properly again !
> 
> The error is due to abi change of win32 gcc. reported here:
> https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/9205
> 
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:52 PM, klutzy <klutzytheklu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've finished `make` on gcc 4.8.1, but `make check-fast` failed:
> >
> >     task <unnamed> failed at 'assertion failed: `(left == right) &&
> > (right == left)`
> >     (left: `t_317::TwoU64s{one: 98784247808u64, two: 257698037760u64}`,
> >     right: `t_317::TwoU64s{one: 22u64, two: 94489280535u64}`)',
> >     
> > C:\home\stone\rust-vanilla\src\test\run-pass\extern-pass-TwoU64s-ref.rs:27
> >     make: *** 
> > [i686-pc-mingw32/test/run_pass_stage2_driver-i686-pc-mingw32.out]
> > Error 101
> >
> > I previously met this when I tested on mingw-w64/32bit.
> > (https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/8996)
> > Seems like the failure is related to recent gcc.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:35 PM, klutzy <klutzytheklu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> some more explanation:
> >>
> >> #include <fenv.h> causes /lib/gcc/mingw32/<ver>/include/c++/fenv.h to
> >> be included.
> >> The header contains:
> >>
> >>     #include <bits/c++config.h>
> >>     #if _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H
> >>     # include_next <fenv.h>
> >>     #endif
> >>
> >> where bits/c++config.h is at /lib/gcc/mingw32/<ver>/include/c++/mingw32.
> >> However, for some reason (I don't know), they removed `#define
> >> _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H 1` somewhere between 4.6.2 and 4.8.1.
> >> so `#include_next <fenv.h>` does not occur, which is
> >> `/include/fenv.h`. It contains some definitions e.g. `FE_ALL_EXCEPT`.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:25 PM, klutzy <klutzytheklu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I've solved it some minutes ago :)
> >>>
> >>> <klutzy> at 
> >>> /path/to/mingw/lib/gcc/mingw32/<ver>/include/c++/mingw32/bits/c++config.h:
> >>> <klutzy> there is #define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H 1 in 4.6.1's header
> >>> <klutzy> but there isn't [such #define] in 4.8.1 header.
> >>> <klutzy> this causes /include/fenv.h not included when llvm does
> >>> #include <fenv.h>
> >>>
> >>> The c++config.h has such lines:
> >>> /* Define to 1 if you have the <fenv.h> header file. */
> >>> /* #undef _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H */
> >>>
> >>> I added `#define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H 1` at the file directly, and it
> >>> works. We can't recommend users to do this hack though.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Vadim <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Yes, but we can't check this into Rust repo.  Maybe it can be worked 
> >>>> around
> >>>> by -DWSAPOLLFD somewhere in makefiles...
> >>>>
> >>>> And just as a heads-up, these seems to be another problem,- with LLVM:
> >>>> http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/bugs/2043/
> >>>>
> >>>> Vadim
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sep 13, 2013, at 9:16 PM, klutzy k <klutzytheklu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Mingw added new winapi at mswsock.h:
> >>>>
> >>>> #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= _WIN32_WINNT_VISTA)
> >>>> int WSAAPI WSAPoll(WSAPOLLFD, ULONG, INT);
> >>>>
> >>>> #endif
> >>>>
> >>>> but they forgot to add definition of WSAPOLLFD.
> >>>>
> >>>> Someone submitted patch at http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/bugs/1980/
> >>>> but seems like it's not on mainstream.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway, we (including libuv) don't use the api. Removing the codeblock 
> >>>> helps
> >>>> us.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Vadim <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hmm.  Looks like mingw released a new version with gcc 4.8 and that 
> >>>> somehow
> >>>>
> >>>> broke mswsock.h (though the file didn't change).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Thad Guidry <thadgui...@gmail.com> 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Doesn't work...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Errors regarding libuv and mswsock...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3038909
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Vadim <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Brian,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually, I would argue that these changes *should* be made before 0.8
> >>>>
> >>>> release in order to smoothen the path of people who will install 0.8 to 
> >>>> try
> >>>>
> >>>> it out.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regarding the work to be done, as far as I know all you need is:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Save libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll and libstdc++-6.dll from %mingw%\bin
> >>>>
> >>>> 2. "mingw-get update"
> >>>>
> >>>> 3. "mingw-get upgrade"
> >>>>
> >>>> 4. run %rust%\configure  (not sure if actually needed, but won't hurt)
> >>>>
> >>>> 5. "make clean"
> >>>>
> >>>> 6. "make check", which will fail at building stage1 std crate because
> >>>>
> >>>> step 3 upgraded libgcc and libstdc++ and stage0 compiler needs them.
> >>>>
> >>>> 7. copy dlls saved in step 1 into %rust%\build\i686-pc-mingw32\stage0\bin
> >>>>
> >>>> 8. "make check" again, which should succeed this time
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Can somebody please verify that this works?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Re mingw-w64: sort of works, however its' phtreads implementation seems
> >>>>
> >>>> to be buggy.   Also see this thread.  I don't think we'll should migrate 
> >>>> to
> >>>>
> >>>> it just yet.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Vadim
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Brian Anderson <bander...@mozilla.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 09/12/2013 12:39 PM, Thad Guidry wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, there should not be a reason anymore, if I am correct, to not have
> >>>>
> >>>> GCC 4.7 in MinGW for Rust Windows users anymore.  I will give that a try
> >>>>
> >>>> also , and if it works, then we can close out (#8598).  (I also would 
> >>>> like
> >>>>
> >>>> to get rid of the 4.5 downgrade needed).... but that does need more 
> >>>> testing
> >>>>
> >>>> from the core Rust team and others.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It's something that Brian has been counting on me to help make happen,
> >>>>
> >>>> and Alex is also contributing to some of that effort by fixing various 
> >>>> LLVM
> >>>>
> >>>> build issues that affect Windows Rust users as you mention in (#8598).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Agreed, if a new stage0 compiler snapshot can be created, then we should
> >>>>
> >>>> be in the clear to also close out #5878.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for everybody's amazing contributions to our Windows support. If
> >>>>
> >>>> somebody makes the changes necessary to work with a newer toolchain then 
> >>>> we
> >>>>
> >>>> will upgrade the bots. It's unlikely we can do this before 0.8 though, 
> >>>> due
> >>>>
> >>>> in two weeks.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I gather that some folks would like to switch to the mingw-w64 toolchain
> >>>>
> >>>> as well. Is that in the cards here?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>
> >>>> Rust-dev mailing list
> >>>>
> >>>> Rust-dev@mozilla.org
> >>>>
> >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>
> >>>> Rust-dev mailing list
> >>>>
> >>>> Rust-dev@mozilla.org
> >>>>
> >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> -Thad
> >>>>
> >>>> Thad on Freebase.com
> >>>>
> >>>> Thad on LinkedIn
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>
> >>>> Rust-dev mailing list
> >>>>
> >>>> Rust-dev@mozilla.org
> >>>>
> >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
> >>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> Rust-dev@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
                                          
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to