在 2013年11月19日 下午8:41,"Gaetan" <[email protected]>写道:
>
> I think this is precisely one of the bigest issue, from a newbee point of
view. And I agree with spir on this point. It's not that important, but you
end up placing them everywhere "to make the compiler happy".
>
> ~str should be a ~T. If it is not, it should use another semantic.
>
+1

> However, I don't see where you explain this subtility in the tutorial,
didn't you added it recently?
>
> PS: I'm french, I know pretty well that all subtilities (other words for
"exception to the general rules") my natural language has their own reason,
BUT if I wanted to redesign french, I would get rid of all these rules,
exceptions, rules in the exceptions. And exceptions in the rules of
exceptions...
>
> -----
> Gaetan
>
>
>
> 2013/11/19 Daniel Micay <[email protected]>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Gaetan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > "The most common use case for owned boxes is creating recursive data
>> > structures like a binary search tree."
>> >
>> > I don't think this is the most common use of owned boxes: string
management,
>> > ...
>> >
>> > I don't think it a good idea to place "binary search tree" in a
tutorial.
>> > You don't do this every day :)
>> >
>> > -----
>> > Gaetan
>>
>> ~str isn't an ~T, in the existing type system
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to