This is why I am reserving commentation right now and have been consistently asking about Rust providing a build system in all other emails. Can the other commenters refocus with the rest of us back to the original question?
Corey Richardson <co...@octayn.net> wrote: >On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Lee Braiden <leebr...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> Another point is that we don't really need a massively complicated >"build >> system" right now, as far as I know. >> >> I don't know rust well yet, but it's a two-line script to load this >data >> (excluding comments). Another few lines to figure out whether to >build a >> library or an executable, another few to run rustc with the list of >files, >> OR to output that list to a Makefile, or a CMakeList.txt, or an IDE >project >> file. >> > >This thread is deviating from its purpose. The idea isn't to hash out >a generic build system for all of Rust, merely for the compiler + >stdlib.
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
