"internals" means compiler internals and all usually. (cf #rust-internals on IRC, the internals tag on Discourse, etc)
AFAICT it will still be completely open for all to comment on -Manish Goregaokar On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomi Pieviläinen <tomi.pievilai...@iki.fi> wrote: > My last comment about visibility of the discourse pretty much > immediately side-tracked into the merits and flaws of mailing lists... > But nobody really answered whether the absence of links from the Rust > homepage to the discourse was intentional. > > Does internal use then mean that it is meant only for those "in the > know", and only the future general discourse will be put on the home > page? At least I'm interested in following the dev discussion, even if > I'm not an insider, and I heard of it purely by accident. > > -- > Tomi Pieviläinen, +358 400 487 504 > A: Because it disrupts the natural way of thinking. > Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
