Hello Ralph. Ralph Corderoy wrote in <20190329131453.6f21022...@orac.inputplus.co.uk>: |> I guess to satisfy this service i have to reinstantiate the MX record |> that has been there before Russell Bell started sending to the |> resolved CNAME instead of the CNAME itself. | |But you don't have to satisfy this broken service that knowingly and |wilfully violates RFCs and yet, it seems, does not lobby the IETF for a |new RFC to amend the widely followed policy. | |To bow to their diktat lessens the value of all RFCs. The mailing list |works fine for those of us following the RFC.
Well yes, but i am a coward. I have reinstalled it. I mean, the RFC says you need to look for MX so let's just satisfy this request and everything is op, but for Russell who does not like CNAME but does not want O_NOFOLLOW. So what, the world is not perfect, that cannot be helped. Be liberal in what you expect but strict in what you produce never bounces. Ciao, --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
