Sorry George, (and Schall, King, Morton, and Odiorne), but I believe Fred's New Royal Palm will be pulled by FP7s, not PS4s. But it will look great anyway. Has the date been set yet for Fred's Open House? - Earl Henry, Nashville In a message dated 11/6/2012 6:32:09 P.M. Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
Fred, You are aware we (Schall, King, Morton, Odiorne, myself and others, are coming to your place for a layout visit in 12 months? (8-) Earl Henry and I are dying to see PS-4's pulling the Royal Palm. See you then, no pressure. George Courteny --- In [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) , gftolhurst@... wrote: > > My problem is, I am afflicted with a love of passenger trains. If I ever do get an S scale layout built, radii will indeed be at the top of my priority list, simply to get the varnish to look as good as possible! > > > Of course, Bob W is right--the track plan gets limited by space very quickly... > > > Fred T in Tennessee > > > P. S. George Courtney is more of a man of action than I. He builds while I alternately dream and worry :-) > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Werre <bob@...> > To: S-Scale <[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) > > Sent: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 6:02 pm > Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Raduis Roll Call > > > > > > George, you're right. If your radii is put at the top of the priority list, it won't take long for even a fair sized room to become just an oval of track without a lot of operational possibilities. That's the problem the 0 guys normally have! > > Bob Werre > PhotoTraxx > > > > On 11/6/12 4:49 PM, gsc3 wrote: > > > I wish I had larger radius for looks. But the trackplan, not coupler swing or lack thereof determined my radius. I wanted to accomplish certain operational moves on the layout and this led me to the radius I adopted. > > George Courtney >
