OK, maybe this time I'll actually compose the message before I hit send!

First, some business: The Fall, 2012 issue of the 1:64 Modeling Guide (Volume 
12, Number 4) is now available on the website (www.1-64ModelingGuide.com), as 
are the other issues that make up Volume 12.  Also, the "printer-friendly" 
(portrait) electronic version of the Fall, 2008 issue (Volume 10, Number 1 is 
also available online.

Second: Thanks to everyone who supported the magazine and for the kind comments 
I've received.  I am gradually getting to responding to each person 
individually.

There have been a lot of good points made, but I have a couple to make from the 
publisher's perspective.

1) I did manage to grow the subscription base by over 30% from the prior owner. 
 Unfortunately, it needed to go up more like 130% ! At the end of the day, 
though, the simple fact is the brand "1:64 Modeling Guide" was too badly 
damaged to recover.  My mistake was not listening to Dick Karnes and a couple 
of others and changing the name (retiring the brand) early on.  Re-styling and 
improving the product (and I think I did improve the product considerably) were 
not enough, as is often the case in business when a brand goes in the tank.  

2) Changing to an e-zine was NOT a mistake.  If there was a mistake with this 
decision, it was not doing it a year earlier (a couple of readers tried to make 
that case to me as well).  I simply could not give my customers a full-color, 
quality publication on a regular basis given the number of subscriber and 
advertising revenue coming in.  Those who make the point about generational 
differences are absolutely correct.  More about that below.  I did actually 
emulate "Model Railroad Hobbyist" as far as format was concerned, but using 
their business model wouldn't have worked for an S scale publication.  It 
relies on all of its revenue from paid advertising.

3) Speaking of advertisers, there simply wasn't enough of them.  If I got the 
same level of support from advertisers that the prior owner did, things may 
have turned out a little differently.  I did some comparisons.  Very 
interesting, to say the least.  Ed L's point about advertisers was interesting. 
 I heard more than once: "But if I advertise my product(s) more people will 
want it."  Well, duh!!  Isn't that the whole point of being in BUSINESS?!?  I 
realize that most hobby businesses are not full-time affairs and may be 
off-shoots of other enterprises, but still...

4) More on generations: If indeed all one needs to do to sell their products is 
send out a notice here or there on the Internet or work their own mailing list, 
or go to a couple of trains shows, then doesn't that tell us that maybe we have 
too much of a "closed society"--if I may put it that way.  I often thought that 
the "This product is not intended for persons under 14 years of age" notices on 
S Helper and other boxes was a misprint.  It should read "This product is not 
intended for persons under 70 years of age!"  Aging population plus negative 
population growth equals extinction.  So, I am always happy to see S scale in 
the national model railroad press because we need to get more modelers 
interested in S scale sooner.  This is what I think MTH will focus a lot of 
their attention on, by the way.  Too bad some of what I've seen on this group 
and elsewhere didn't make it my way.  The magazine would have been even better!

So, my take is I did a pretty good job in my very first-ever stint editing and 
publishing a magazine.  Sure, some issues were better than others, but consider 
this: except for a proofreader or two, I was the only editorial and business 
person listed on the masthead.  Compare that to "Model Railroad Hobbyist", 
"Narrow Gauge & Short Line Gazette", "S Gaugian", etc.  Even the prior owner 
had 2 people working on the publication and business!  

Sorry for the long post, but I just wanted to make a few points of my own to 
try to put things in perspective for us.  Officially, only the name "1:64 
Modeling Guide" magazine is finished.  While there is the possibility of a new 
magazine, I have to say the comments are pushing me toward the "no" column.  I 
think the universe of S scalers is large enough, but the actual numbers don't 
lie.  Meanwhile, I will be pursuing other publishing projects of interest to S 
scalers as well as all model railroaders.  New products will still be coming 
out from RLN Publishing.

Thanks for reading.  

Bob Nalbone
President,
RLN Publishing



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to