Great work Kurtt Lin! Keep new features coming!
Renato M. 2013/9/3 Kurtt Lin <kurtt....@gmail.com> > Hi, Flavio, Matthieu, Patrick, and all > > Cheer up, guys. I'm seeing opportunities in this stream processing field as > well as in S4. What I haven’t mentioned is that, S4 had found successful > applications in our research group even back in the 0.3.0 days and now in > our start-up. We have built scalable real time search over microblogs with > some S4 features enhanced (the paper appears in 2013’s EDBT proceedings, > link is > http://www.edbt.org/Proceedings/2013-Genova/papers/edbt/a31-lin.pdf); > we also built a platform on top of S4 for detecting and analyzing real-time > traffic conditions, processing over hundreds of millions of records every > day. > > Now we plan to contribute to the community. I personally have created and > responded to some JIRAs, but I would like to do more. Actually, I am > ongoing proposing a design documentation of integrating S4 with Helix along > the roadmap; this would help enhancing the elasticity feature for S4. > > So, I suppose we could put the "retirement" discussion aside? Give us the > new comers some time perhaps a couple of months to see what we can do to > make the community healthier. Of course, some of us are new; we shall ask > for your help and guidance occasionally, please be responsive (as what you > are doing now), :) > > You all have done brilliant jobs! :) > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Correct, I was referring to the rece > > > > nt thread about shutting down the > > s4 podling. In the incubator that's called "retirement" > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html > > > > Glad to see folks stepping up! > > > > Patrick > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fpjunque...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > > > I think Pat is referring to the discussion we have had when I proposed > > to retire the project. I didn't use this exact word, but it is > essentially > > what I meant. You and a few others stepped up and said that you wouldn't > > like to see it retiring and would like to give it a shot at helping with > > building a community, contributing patches, and just increasing activity > in > > general. > > > > > > Does it make sense? > > > > > > -Flavio > > > > > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 8:27 PM, Oleg Tikhonov <o...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> the item 3 - deleted completely. > > >> > > >> Can you shed more light on "retirement" discussion. I am new here and > > >> probably missed it. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> I would remove 3 entirely - that's not needed for graduation. > > >>> > > >>> You should also mention the result of the "retirement" discussion - > > >>> give the ipmc/board some insight: that folks stepped up and are > > >>> pushing forward, i.e. no retirement at this point. > > >>> > > >>> Patrick > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Oleg Tikhonov <o...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >>>> Thanks ! > > >>>> > > >>>> Added Patrick's & Flavio's comments. > > >>>> http://pastebin.com/M83sB2z8 > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Is there anything else? > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> > > >>>> Oleg > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, FPJ <fpjunque...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> When you say put out more releases, do you mean more in number or > > having > > >>>>> releases more frequently? S4 has had two releases already, but the > > >>>>> frequency > > >>>>> of releases has been low in the past. I think activity is a real > > issue. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Your point 2 is a good summary of what I've been trying to say. We > > are > > >>> on > > >>>>> the same page there. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -Flavio > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > > >>>>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:ph...@apache.org] > > >>>>>> Sent: 03 September 2013 06:42 > > >>>>>> To: s4-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: draft of ASF board report > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I have a few comments: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> 1) I don't think the issues listed in "Three most important issues > > to > > >>>>> address in > > >>>>>> the move towards graduation" are apropos. What you want to list > here > > >>> is > > >>>>>> things blocking graduation. IMO this is two things; 1) put out > more > > >>>>> releases, > > >>>>>> and 2) build community (of which 2 is more important at this > point) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> 2) I think you should also include mention of a PPMC member > > requesting > > >>>>>> that the podling be retired - and the results of that discussion. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Patrick > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote: > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the effort! That looks good to me, except maybe that > in > > >>> my > > >>>>>>>> view the real issue about graduation is the activity. Adding > more > > >>>>>>>> requirements will only raise up the bar for graduation. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I think the IPMC would expect to see a more active and > > >>> self-governing > > >>>>>>> project before voting for graduation, whether or not the podling > > >>> puts > > >>>>>>> that down as an issue. (See: > > >>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> jzb > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Joe Brockmeier > > >>>>>>> j...@zonker.net > > >>>>>>> Twitter: @jzb > > >>>>>>> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > > > > >
