the item 3 - deleted completely. Can you shed more light on "retirement" discussion. I am new here and probably missed it.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > I would remove 3 entirely - that's not needed for graduation. > > You should also mention the result of the "retirement" discussion - > give the ipmc/board some insight: that folks stepped up and are > pushing forward, i.e. no retirement at this point. > > Patrick > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Oleg Tikhonov <o...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thanks ! > > > > Added Patrick's & Flavio's comments. > > http://pastebin.com/M83sB2z8 > > > > > > Is there anything else? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, FPJ <fpjunque...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> When you say put out more releases, do you mean more in number or having > >> releases more frequently? S4 has had two releases already, but the > >> frequency > >> of releases has been low in the past. I think activity is a real issue. > >> > >> Your point 2 is a good summary of what I've been trying to say. We are > on > >> the same page there. > >> > >> -Flavio > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:ph...@apache.org] > >> > Sent: 03 September 2013 06:42 > >> > To: s4-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> > Subject: Re: draft of ASF board report > >> > > >> > I have a few comments: > >> > > >> > 1) I don't think the issues listed in "Three most important issues to > >> address in > >> > the move towards graduation" are apropos. What you want to list here > is > >> > things blocking graduation. IMO this is two things; 1) put out more > >> releases, > >> > and 2) build community (of which 2 is more important at this point) > >> > > >> > 2) I think you should also include mention of a PPMC member requesting > >> > that the podling be retired - and the results of that discussion. > >> > > >> > Patrick > >> > > >> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> > wrote: > >> > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for the effort! That looks good to me, except maybe that in > my > >> > >> view the real issue about graduation is the activity. Adding more > >> > >> requirements will only raise up the bar for graduation. > >> > > > >> > > I think the IPMC would expect to see a more active and > self-governing > >> > > project before voting for graduation, whether or not the podling > puts > >> > > that down as an issue. (See: > >> > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community) > >> > > > >> > > Best, > >> > > > >> > > jzb > >> > > -- > >> > > Joe Brockmeier > >> > > j...@zonker.net > >> > > Twitter: @jzb > >> > > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ > >> > >> >
