Hi Anne, > Mike pointed out to me that in your patch kshape-om.patch there > are functions such as k_boundary, k_interior, k_shape. In addition > to is_core, it would be good to have this in sage soon.
+1 > What is your timeline for your patch? When do you plan to post it on > trac? If not soon, would it be ok to put these functions into a > separate patch, together with ktableau and KCore, and have them > integrated fairly soon? Currently the patch contains a lot of highly experimental stuff. I do have now a conjectural bijection so it is highly possible that from the research point of view, things finish by stabilizing soon, but I don't think we will find the time to clean it up in order to integrate it in sage. So I think it would be good to have them in a separate patch. Oliver do you have any modif on the k-shape patch ? Can I refresh it ? > By the way, as far as I know Andrew Mathas changed k_core and r_core > to just core (same for quotient). By the same logic, should > KCore and KCores become just Core and Cores? +1 Cheers, Florent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
