> The only reason why we don't have cartan matrices, as matrices, is
> that we don't have (yet!) matrices with rows and columns indexed by
> anything (instead of just 0...n-1); e.g. the analog for matrices of
> CombinatorialFreeModule elements w.r.t. FreeModule elements.

What about allowing a skew-symmetric matrix (and an optional indexing
list) as input for DynkinDiagram?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to