> > here is a "disadvantage" of this solution: > > sage: d = DyckWord([]) > sage: d.maps._parent.maps._parent.maps._parent.maps.map1() > [] > Its not a bug, its a feature. :)
> Other thoughts? > One thing comes to mind that the documentation for .maps or .statistics should make clear that this is there for organizing the name space for tab completion. I wonder if it should use a novel naming convention like 'maps_.<tab>' instead of just 'maps.<tab>' That way it is clear that the name space goes deeper. It seems like a good idea to use some sort of different naming convention. -Mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/HlL36FCO29sJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
