On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:23:54PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> - I would very much favor adding tab completion, in the terminal and
> the notebook, on function options (this should be doable). And then
> one could have:
>
> sage: p.to_permutation(bijection=<tab>
>
> if not just:
>
> sage: p.to_permutation(<tab>
>
> The bijections themselves could be implemented as:
>
> sage: p._to_permutation_foo()
> sage: p._to_permutation_bar()
>
> either in the class or p, or in super class, or some mix thereof.
>
> - I love the idea of having a framework to retrieve and manipulate
> (composition, ...) maps between parents. And experiments in that
> direction are very welcome.
Ok, let restate this a bit: I like Christian's idiom `p.maps.<tab>`,
as long as it is implemented on top of something simple, like the
plain methods `p._to_...` above.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
